MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3044907848 · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000004500

Impact of Failure of Noninvasive Ventilation on the Safety of Pediatric Tracheal Intubation*

2020· article· en· W3044907848 on OpenAlexaffabout
Guillaume Émériaud, Natalie Napolitano, Lee Polikoff, John S. Giuliano, Iris Toedt‐Pingel, Michael Miksa, Simon Li, Kris Bysani, Deyin D. Hsing, Sholeen Nett, David Turner, Ronald C. Sanders, Jan Hau Lee, Michelle Adu‐Darko, Erin Owen, Sandeep Gangadharan, Margaret M. Parker, Vicki Montgomery, Nancy Craig, Benjamin Crulli, Lauren Edwards, M. C. W. Pinto, Fabrice Brunet, Justine Shults, Vinay Nadkarni, Akira Nishisaki

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAirway Management and Intubation Techniques
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality
KeywordsMedicineIntubationTracheal intubationAnesthesiaLaryngospasmVentilation (architecture)Nasal cannulaMechanical ventilationAirwayRespiratory failureIntensive careCannulaSurgeryIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Noninvasive ventilation is widely used to avoid tracheal intubation in critically ill children. The objective of this study was to assess whether noninvasive ventilation failure was associated with severe tracheal intubation-associated events and severe oxygen desaturation during tracheal intubation. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter cohort study of consecutive intubated patients using the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children registry. SETTING: Thirteen PICUs (in 12 institutions) in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing tracheal intubation in participating sites were included. Noninvasive ventilation failure group included children with any use of high-flow nasal cannula, continuous positive airway pressure, or bilevel noninvasive ventilation in the 6 hours prior to tracheal intubation. Primary tracheal intubation group included children without exposure to noninvasive ventilation within 6 hours before tracheal intubation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Severe tracheal intubation-associated events (cardiac arrest, esophageal intubation with delayed recognition, emesis with aspiration, hypotension requiring intervention, laryngospasm, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum) and severe oxygen desaturation (< 70%) were recorded prospectively. The study included 956 tracheal intubation encounters; 424 tracheal intubations (44%) occurred after noninvasive ventilation failure, with a median of 13 hours (interquartile range, 4-38 hr) of noninvasive ventilation. Noninvasive ventilation failure group included more infants (47% vs 33%; p < 0.001) and patients with a respiratory diagnosis (56% vs 30%; p < 0.001). Noninvasive ventilation failure was not associated with severe tracheal intubation-associated events (5% vs 5% without noninvasive ventilation; p = 0.96) but was associated with severe desaturation (15% vs 9% without noninvasive ventilation; p = 0.005). After controlling for baseline differences, noninvasive ventilation failure was not independently associated with severe tracheal intubation-associated events (p = 0.35) or severe desaturation (p = 0.08). In the noninvasive ventilation failure group, higher FIO2 before tracheal intubation (≥ 70%) was associated with severe tracheal intubation-associated events. CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill children are frequently exposed to noninvasive ventilation before intubation. Noninvasive ventilation failure was not independently associated with severe tracheal intubation-associated events or severe oxygen desaturation compared to primary tracheal intubation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care MedicineSame topicAirway Management and Intubation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207