Improving the ergonomics of hand tracking inputs to VR HMD's
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study improves the ergonomics of using the Leap Motion hand tracking device with an Oculus Rift. The improvements\nwere realised through the use of a 3D printed mount that angled the Leap Motion down by 30 degrees.\nThis allowed for users to interact with a virtual environment in which their arms may be held in a biomechanically\nless stressful location, rather than up and in front of their face. To validate the configuration, 15 participants completed\na specially designed task which involved pressing virtual buttons in a given location. The button pressing\ntask was performed in three configurations that compared the angled mount against the standard forward facing\nmount. Results indicate that the angled mount eliminates tracking loses, whilst producing comparable accuracy\nagainst the control condition and allowing the participant to interact in a more natural arm posture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it