MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3044973020 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2019-0818

Soil-water characteristic curves of bentonites in isochoric conditions during wetting: measurement and prediction

2020· article· en· W3044973020 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tadikonda Venkata Bharat, Yagom Gapak

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndian Institute of Technology GuwahatiDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsIsochoric processWettingBentoniteSuctionMaterials scienceCompactionGeotechnical engineeringSoil scienceThermodynamicsGeologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The determination of the soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) of compacted bentonites in the isochoric condition is a prerequisite for unsaturated flow simulations in several geoenvironmental applications. The SWCC data are, however, not readily available for many compacted bentonites over a wide suction range due to difficulties associated with the testing. In this work, wetting SWCCs of four Indian bentonites of different plasticity were established experimentally at compaction dry densities of 1.4, 1.6, and 1.8 Mg/m 3 in isochoric conditions using two independent laboratory techniques in different suction ranges. The modified Kovács (MK) model was extended to simulate the SWCC data of the Indian bentonites. Empirical relationships between MK model parameters and compaction dry density for these bentonites were established. A theoretical procedure for the estimation of SWCCs of the compacted bentonites based on the basic bentonite properties and proposed correlations was proposed and validated on the available wetting SWCC data of compacted GaoMiaoZi (GMZ), MX80, and FEBEX bentonites from the literature studies. The proposed method predicts the wetting SWCCs of compacted powder bentonites, in volume-restrained condition, from the basic properties satisfactorily. The proposed model is an approximate method for predicting the SWCCs of bentonites in the absence of measured data and in understanding the influence of dry density and plasticity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207