Quelles sont les perceptions des élèves présentant des difficultés comportementales quant aux conditions qui influencent leur scolarisation en classe ordinaire?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’éducation inclusive, qui préconise la scolarisation dans un cadre le plus normal possible, s’impose comme la voie privilégiée pour favoriser la réussite éducative de tous les élèves. Malgré les conditions suggérées pour soutenir celle-ci, l’expérience scolaire des élèves présentant des difficultés comportementales reste difficile. Est-il possible que ces conditions ne tiennent pas compte du point de vue des élèves? La méthode de recension des écrits (n = 42 études: 31 qualitatives, 2 quantitatives, 7 mixtes, 2 recensions) a permis de répondre à l’objectif d’identifier les conditions qui soutiennent ou freinent la scolarisation en classe ordinaire selon les élèves présentant des difficultés comportementales. Dans les deux cas, la relation avec l’enseignant s’avère la condition la plus souvent mentionnée. Les résultats sont discutés à la lumière des caractéristiques méthodologiques des ouvrages pour orienter les futures études.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".