MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045125794 · doi:10.4103/jpi.jpi_10_20

Deep Learning to Estimate Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Status from Hematoxylin and Eosin-Stained Breast Tissue Images

2020· article· en· W3045125794 on OpenAlexaff
Deepak Anand, Nikhil Cherian Kurian, Shubham Dhage, Neeraj Kumar, Swapnil Rane, Peter H. Gann, Amit Sethi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pathology Informatics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in cancer detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsH&E stainImmunohistochemistryBreast cancerStainDigital pathologyPathologyMedicineHuman Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceStainingInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONTEXT: Several therapeutically important mutations in cancers are economically detected using immunohistochemistry (IHC), which highlights the overexpression of specific antigens associated with the mutation. However, IHC panels can be imprecise and relatively expensive in low-income settings. On the other hand, although hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining used to visualize the general tissue morphology is a routine and low cost, it does not highlight any specific antigen or mutation. AIMS: Using the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) mutation in breast cancer as an example, we strengthen the case for cost-effective detection and screening of overexpression of HER2 protein in H&E-stained tissue. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: We use computational methods that reliably detect subtle morphological changes associated with the over-expression of mutation-specific proteins directly from H&E images. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We trained a classification pipeline to determine HER2 overexpression status of H&E stained whole slide images. Our training dataset was derived from a single hospital containing 26 (11 HER2+ and 15 HER2-) cases. We tested the classification pipeline on 26 (8 HER2+ and 18 HER2-) held-out cases from the same hospital and 45 independent cases (23 HER2+ and 22 HER2-) from the TCGA-BRCA cohort. The pipeline was composed of a stain separation module and three deep neural network modules in tandem for robustness and interpretability. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: We evaluate our trained model through area under the curve (AUC)-receiver operating characteristic. RESULTS: Our pipeline achieved an AUC of 0.82 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.98) on held-out cases and an AUC of 0.76 (CI: 0.61-0.89) on the independent dataset from TCGA. We also demonstrate the region-level correspondence of HER2 overexpression between a patient's IHC and H&E serial sections. CONCLUSIONS: Our work strengthens the case for automatically quantifying the overexpression of mutation-specific proteins in H&E-stained digital pathology, and it highlights the importance of multi-stage machine learning pipelines for added robustness and interpretability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pathology InformaticsSame topicAI in cancer detectionFrench-language works237,207