Visual Analytics of Electronic Health Records with a focus on Acute Kidney Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing use of electronic platforms in healthcare has resulted in the generation of unprecedented amounts of data in recent years. The amount of data available to clinical researchers, physicians, and healthcare administrators continues to grow, which creates an untapped resource with the ability to improve the healthcare system drastically. Despite the enthusiasm for adopting electronic health records (EHRs), some recent studies have shown that EHR-based systems hardly improve the ability of healthcare providers to make better decisions. One reason for this inefficacy is that these systems do not allow for human-data interaction in a manner that fits and supports the needs of healthcare providers. Another reason is the information overload, which makes healthcare providers often misunderstand, misinterpret, ignore, or overlook vital data. The emergence of a type of computational system known as visual analytics (VA), has the potential to reduce the complexity of EHR data by combining advanced analytics techniques with interactive visualizations to analyze, synthesize, and facilitate high-level activities while allowing users to get more involved in a discourse with the data. The purpose of this research is to demonstrate the use of sophisticated visual analytics systems to solve various EHR-related research problems. This dissertation includes a framework by which we identify gaps in existing EHR-based systems and conceptualize the data-driven activities and tasks of our proposed systems. Two novel VA systems (VISA_M3R3 and VALENCIA) and two studies are designed to bridge the gaps. VISA_M3R3 incorporates multiple regression, frequent itemset mining, and interactive visualization to assist users in the identification of nephrotoxic medications. Another proposed system, VALENCIA, brings a wide range of dimension reduction and cluster analysis techniques to analyze high-dimensional EHRs, integrate them seamlessly, and make them accessible through interactive visualizations. The studies are conducted to develop prediction models to classify patients who are at risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI) and identify AKI-associated medication and medication combinations using EHRs. Through healthcare administrative datasets stored at the ICES-KDT (Kidney Dialysis and Transplantation program), London, Ontario, we have demonstrated how our proposed systems and prediction models can be used to solve real-world problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".