MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045147557 · doi:10.23925/cafi.v3i2.47027

Incidencias de la certificación NIIF en el mercado laboral contable

2020· article· pt· W3045147557 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCAFI - Contabilidade Atuária Finanças & Informação · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAccounting and Financial Management
Canadian institutions123 Certification (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este artículo se analiza la importancia de las Certificaciones NIIF en Colombia. Concretamente, lo que se quería indagar era si este tipo de certificaciones, median -como instituciones- para la contratación del mercado laboral de los servicios contables, y cuál era el nivel de eficiencia que ellas ofrecen. Para lograrlo, se hicieron encuestas y un grupo focal a profesionales del área. Con base en las teorías de la economía neoinstitucional y la metodología fenomenológica, se analizaron los datos recogidos. Los resultados apuntaron a que la Certificación NIIF, en Colombia, todavía no es una institución, puesto que no ayuda a disminuir la asimetría de la información y la incertidumbre acerca de las competencias del profesional contable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it