Hollow waxberry-like cobalt–nickel oxide/S,N-codoped carbon nanospheres as a trifunctional electrocatalyst for OER, ORR, and HER
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the aggravation of the energy crisis, increasing attention has been paid to electrocatalytic technology for renewable energy devices. In particular, the research on catalysts towards the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) has become more urgent, and the development of multifunctional electrocatalysts has become a research trend. Here we report the synthesis of waxberry-like cobalt-nickel oxide/S,N-codoped carbon hollow nanocomposites as trifunctional catalysts. Uniform cobalt-nickel glycerate solid spheres are first synthesized as the precursor and subsequently chemically transformed into cobalt-nickel oxide/S,N-codoped carbon hollow nanospheres. Benefiting from the synergistic coupling of cobalt-nickel oxide and S,N-codoped carbon nanocomposites, hierarchical porosity and hollow structure, the cobalt-nickel oxide/S,N-codoped carbon nanohybrids exhibit superior trifunctional electrocatalytic activity and durability towards OER, ORR, and HER in alkaline media.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".