Coordination Chemistry in the Structural and Functional Exploration of Actinide-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The coordination chemistry between inorganic and organic species can be optimally exemplified by metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), whose structures and functionalities can be rationally designed from these highly tunable building blocks. The high porosity, stability, and versatile functionalities of MOFs have attracted wide-spread attention from energy-related research and pollution remediation to biomedical applications. A unique and underexplored subset of these materials are MOFs based on actinide nodes; these MOFs have distinguished themselves as a unique platform for investigating the versatile oxidation states, reactivity, and coordination chemistry of actinides. Herein, we will focus on the rational design and synthesis of actinide-based MOFs under the general guidelines of coordination chemistry for their structural and functional explorations. The dimensionality, topology, and structures of actinide-based MOFs can be controlled by selecting pre-designed building blocks of actinide-based nodes and organic linkers with certain desired coordination geometries and functionalities. These unique actinide-based MOFs have shown promise for applications in nuclear waste mitigation, pollution control, and catalysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".