Investigasi kapasitas kepemimpinan dalam kelompok peternak sapi PO Kebumen di pesisir Kabupaten Kebumen
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: The sustainability of the Kebumen Ongole Grade cattle farmers groups in the coastal area of Kebumen Regency has become very important to support the increase in beef cattle production in the countryside. Leadership capacity is the ability of group leaders in managing groups and their members toward more dynamic groups of farmers. This study aimed to identify the leadership capacity of Kebumen Ongole Grade cattle farmers and analyze the relationship between demographic factors and the leadership capacity of Kebumen Ongole Grade cattle farmers.Methods: One hundred forty-seven respondents of Kebumen Ongole Grade cattle farmers were taken using the multistage sampling method to provide an assessment of the leadership capacity of the head of Kebumen Ongole Grade cattle farmers group. The collected data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and Spearman rank correlationResults: The analysis showed that the age of the group leader, the experience of the group leader involved in the farmers group, and the experience of the group leader in raising beef cattle has a significant relationship with the leadership capacity in the group (P <0.05).Conclusions: The heads of the Kebumen Ongole Grade cattle farmers groups had high leadership capacity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it