Time-domain elastic Gauss–Newton full-waveform inversion: a matrix-free approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY We present a time-domain matrix-free elastic Gauss–Newton full-waveform inversion (FWI) algorithm. Our algorithm consists of a Gauss–Newton update with a search direction calculated via elastic least-squares reverse time migration (LSRTM). The conjugate gradient least-squares (CGLS) method solves the LSRTM problem with forward and adjoint operators derived via the elastic Born approximation. The Hessian of the Gauss–Newton method is never explicitly formed or saved in memory. In other words, the CGLS algorithm solves for the Gauss–Newton direction via the application of implicit-form forward and adjoint operators which are equivalent to elastic Born modelling and elastic reverse time migration, respectively. We provide numerical examples to test the proposed algorithm where we invert for P- and S-wave velocities simultaneously. The proposed algorithm performs positively on mid-size problems where we report solutions of slight improvement than those computed using the conventional non-linear conjugate gradient method. In spite of the aforementioned limited gain, the theory developed in this paper contributes to a better understanding of time-domain elastic Gauss–Newton FWI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".