MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045332585 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2020.3011628

Probabilistic Shaping in Time-Frequency-Packed Terabit Superchannel Transmission

2020· article· en· W3045332585 on OpenAlexafffund
Mrinmoy Jana, Lutz Lampe, Jeebak Mitra, Wang Jin, Kevin Law

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)University of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTerabitWavelength-division multiplexingComputer scienceElectronic engineeringMultiplexerMultiplexingSpectral efficiencyTransmission (telecommunications)Interference (communication)Equalization (audio)Intersymbol interferenceOptical add-drop multiplexerChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsOptical performance monitoringOpticsWavelengthEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To combine the individual benefits of probabilistic-shaping (PS) and time-frequency-packing (TFP), we consider for the first time PS-TFP wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) superchannels. However, TFP introduces inter-symbol interference (ISI) and/or inter-carrier interference (ICI). Moreover, the presence of reconfigurable optical add-drop multiplexers in the fiber links may further degrade the system performance. In this letter, we efficiently handle such challenges to present PS-TFP superchannels enabling Terabit-per-second data rates. For this, we perform a joint ISI and ICI channel estimation in tandem with turbo equalization to mitigate the interference. We investigate optimizing the parameters in the shaping and packing dimensions to achieve a desired target spectral efficiency. We show through our numerical results that such an optimized PS-TFP transmission leads up to 1.2 dB performance improvement over an unshaped Nyquist WDM system under similar conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Photonics Technology LettersSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207