Legislação trabalhista internacional e sua interface com a saúde materno-infantil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo : Descrever a legislacao trabalhista internacional vigente relacionada a saude materna, bem como comparar seus efeitos sobre o binomio mae e filho. Metodo : Estudo descritivo no qual foi utilizado metodo documental. Foram analisadas e categorizadas as legislacoes trabalhistas do Brasil, Canada, Franca, Mocambique e Portugal. A pesquisa foi realizada mediante busca por documentos legais de dominio publico, utilizando as legislacoes trabalhistas relacionadas a saude reprodutiva, promocao da saude e licenca-maternidade, de âmbito nacional e internacional. Resultados : Percebeu-se que todos os paises estudados oferecem licenca maternidade, porem variam-se o periodo de tempo, a remuneracao da mulher e os pre-requisitos que garantem o auxilio. O Canada assiste melhor a mulher em seus direitos trabalhistas e Mocambique apresenta a menor cobertura de direitos trabalhistas. Conclusoes : Concluiu-se que a licenca maternidade que cada pais oferece a mulher influencia diretamente no seu ciclo gravidico-puerperal e ao retorno da sua vida profissional. Palavras-chave: Saude Materna; Legislacao Trabalhista; Promocao da Saude. Objective : To describe the current international labor legislation related to maternal health, as well as to compare its effects on the mother and child binomial. Method : Descriptive study in which documentary method was used. Five labor laws, available in Portuguese, English and French from the following countries were analyzed: Brazil, Canada, France, Mozambique and Portugal. The research was conducted by searching for public domain legal documents, using labor laws related to reproductive health, health promotion and maternity leave, nationally and internationally. Results : Two categories emerged: Comparison of maternity leave and Legal Rights in the construction of maternal and child health. It was noticed that all the countries studied offer maternity leave, but the time period, the woman's remuneration and the prerequisites that guarantee the aid vary. Canada best assists women in their labor rights and Mozambique has the lowest labor rights coverage. Conclusions : It was concluded that the maternity leave that each country offers women directly influences their pregnancy-puerperal cycle and the return of their professional life. Key-words: Maternal Health; Legislation, Labor; Health Promotion . Objetivo : Describir la legislacion laboral internacional actual relacionada con la salud materna, asi como comparar sus efectos en el binomio madre e hijo. Metodo : estudio descriptivo en el que se utilizo el metodo documental. Se analizaron cinco leyes laborales, disponibles en portugues, ingles y frances de los siguientes paises: Brasil, Canada, Francia, Mozambique y Portugal. La investigacion se realizo mediante la busqueda de documentos legales de dominio publico, utilizando leyes laborales relacionadas con la salud reproductiva, la promocion de la salud y la licencia de maternidad, a nivel nacional e internacional. Resultados : Surgieron dos categorias: Comparacion de la licencia de maternidad y Los derechos legales en la construccion de la salud materna e infantil. Se observo que todos los paises estudiados ofrecen licencia de maternidad, pero el periodo de tiempo, la remuneracion de la mujer y los requisitos previos que garantizan la ayuda varian. Canada ayuda mejor a las mujeres en sus derechos laborales y Mozambique tiene la cobertura de derechos laborales mas baja. Conclusiones : se concluyo que el permiso de maternidad que cada pais ofrece a las mujeres influye directamente en su ciclo embarazo-puerperal y en el retorno de su vida profesional. Palabras clave: Salud Materna; Legislacion Laboral; Promocion de La Salud.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".