MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045512079

Biofuels and Bioenergy 2018 - Canadian bioenergy landscape: Key drivers and future potential

2019· article· en· W3045512079 on OpenAlex
Ataullah Khan Mohammed

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives in Chemical Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBioenergy crop production and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiofuelBioenergyNatural resource economicsRenewable energyRenewable fuelsAgricultural economicsEnergy sourceFossil fuelBiomass (ecology)Environmental scienceEngineeringAgroforestryWaste managementBusinessEconomicsEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biofuel is a fuel that is created through contemporary organic procedures, for example, farming and anaerobic assimilation, as opposed to a fuel delivered by land procedures, for example, those engaged with the development of non-renewable energy sources, for example, coal and oil, from ancient natural issue. Biofuels can be gotten straightforwardly from plants, or in a roundabout way from farming, business, local, or potentially modern squanders. Inexhaustible biofuels by and large include contemporary carbon obsession, for example, those that happen in plants or microalgae through the procedure of photosynthesis. Bioenergy is sustainable power source made accessible from materials got from organic sources. Biomass is any natural material which has put away daylight as synthetic vitality. As a fuel, it might incorporate wood, wood squander, straw, excrement, sugarcane, and numerous other results from an assortment of rural procedures. Worldwide vitality request developed by 2.9% and carbon emanations developed by 2.0% in 2018, quicker than whenever since 2010-11.Petroleum gas utilization and creation was up over 5%, probably the most grounded pace of development for both interest and yield for more than 30 years. Renewables developed by 14.5%, approaching their record-breaking increment in 2017, however this despite everything represented uniquely around 33% of the expansion in all out force age. Coal utilization (+1.4%) and creation (+4.3%) expanded for the second year straight in 2018, after three years of decrease (2014-16). The United States recorded the biggest ever yearly creation increments by any nation for both oil and gaseous petrol, by far most of expands originating from inland shale plays. Canada is endowed with abundant natural resources and thecuountry has among the world’s most productive agriculture and forestry sectors. Despite its abundance, biomass is not being utilized to its full potential due to lack of supply chain logisticsand low fossil fuel prices. The Biomass Quality Network Canada (BQNC) was established in 2016 through funding from Agriculture Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) to support the advancement of the Canadian bio-products industry in four main sectors: Biochemicals, Bioenergy, Biofuels and Biomaterials. BQNC supports the Canada’s bio-products industry by enabling the selection, creation, adoption and maintenance of a central database of internationally recognized quality control and assurance standards in coordination with other national and international standards organizations. Bioenergy has been part f the Canadian energy scene for more than 25 years, ranging from heat and power cogeneration, wood pellets, to liquid biofuels. The recent federal and provincial government directives on fossil carbon emission reduction are likely going to be the key drivers for the development of bioenergy markets in Canada. The talk will highlight the key findings of the BQNC bioenergy sector sub-committee pertaining to biomass resource availability and bioenergy potential with the aim of bridging the gap between supply chain, fuel (quality) and equipment suitability with a focus on central western Canada. Suitable recommendation on quality grading of common Canadian agricultural residues vis-a-vis ISO/ TC238 classification will also be presented Biography: Dr. Khan is the lead scientist for the Thermo Chemical Processing group at InnoTech Alberta and also an Adjunct Professor in the Process Systems Engineering, University of Regina. He is also the sector lead for bioenergy initiative at the BQNC (Biomass Quality Network Canada) and a technical ommittee member on Canadian Mirror Committee to ISO/TC 238:Solid Biofuels. At InnoTech Alberta, his research is focused on biomass thermochemical &thermocatalytic conversion pathways to bioenergy, biofuel, bio-chemical or bio-materials. He is a recipient of 2012 Paragon Award for Innovation for the development of innovative catalysts for feed- and process- flexible hydrogen production. He has 3 patents, 1 book chapter, 2 reviews and 30 research articles to his credit. He also served as a Guest Editor for Special Issue on “Metal Oxides in Catalysis” in Molecular Catalysis Journal, Elsevier, 2018

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it