MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045549505 · doi:10.1145/3373207.3404022

A Las Vegas algorithm for computing the smith form of a nonsingular integer matrix

2020· article· en· W3045549505 on OpenAlexaff
Stavros Birmpilis, George Labahn, Arne Storjohann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvertible matrixInteger (computer science)Dimension (graph theory)Matrix (chemical analysis)Integer matrixLas vegasMathematicsCombinatoricsMatrix multiplicationAlgorithmDiscrete mathematicsArithmeticComputer scienceSymmetric matrixNonnegative matrixPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a Las Vegas randomized algorithm to compute the Smith normal form of a nonsingular integer matrix. For an A ∈ Zn×n, the algorithm requires O(n3(log n + log ||A||)2 (log n)2) bit operations using standard integer and matrix arithmetic, where ||A|| = maxij |Aij | denotes the largest entry in absolute value. Fast integer and matrix multiplication can also be used, establishing that the Smith form can be computed in about the same number of bit operations as required to multiply two matrices of the same dimension and size of entries as the input matrix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207