MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045557974 · doi:10.1109/icc40277.2020.9148838

ESP-VDCE: Energy, SLA, and Price-driven Virtual Data Center Embedding

2020· article· en· W3045557974 on OpenAlexaff
Kuljeet Kaur, Sahil Garg, Georges Kaddoum, Song Guo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbeddingComputer scienceData centerCloud computingEnergy (signal processing)Virtual machineScheme (mathematics)Focus (optics)Domain (mathematical analysis)MinificationEnergy minimizationAlgorithmReal-time computingOperating systemArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we present a multi-objective Virtual Data Center Embedding (VDCE) scheme for multi-domain cloud computing setups. The primary focus of the proposed scheme is on -Energy minimization, SLA assurance, and reduced energy Prices; and is named as ESP-driven VDCE. In the preliminary phase of this work, we formulate the proposed scheme as an optimization problem. However, due to the intractability of the formulated problem, its is remodelled and divided into three sub-problems (SP), i.e., data center identification, virtual machine mapping, and virtual link embedding. The output of one SP serves as an input to the next SP, such that the search space can be significantly narrowed. Finally, the proposed approach for VDCE is extensively validated against other algorithms. The obtained results indicate that the proposed ESP-driven VDCE approach achieves almost 7.6% more energy-aware embeddings with 11.5% higher SLA levels and approximately 23% lower energy expenses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207