EVIDENCE OF SOCIAL STRUCTURE INFLUENCING FEEDING BEHAVIOUR IN CAPTIVE LITTLE BROWN BATS (MYOTIS LUCIFUGUS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Social rank and personality (consistent behavioural traits) can influence access to resources that could be critical for fat accumulation and survival from disease. For Little Brown Bats (Myotis lucifugus) recovering from the fungal disease white-nose syndrome, understanding behavioural dynamics may also be important for maintaining animals in captivity for conservation research. We hypothesized that Little Brown Bats will exhibit social structure in captivity, and that social rank and personality affect feeding behaviour. We predicted that bats would arrive at the feeding dish in a similar order each night and that higher ranked and more active individuals would spend more time and feed more frequently at the food dish. Bats arrived at the feeding dish in a similar order each night, suggesting that social rank may affect feeding in captive bat colonies. However, neither the order of arrival or personality correlated with feeding behaviour. We recommend that future studies test for the influence of dominant-subordinate relationships on social structure in captive and free-ranging insectivorous bats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".