MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045610848 · doi:10.1080/17415977.2020.1797003

Colour level set regularization for the electromagnetic imaging of highly discontinuous parameters in 3D

2020· article· en· W3045610848 on OpenAlexaff
A. J. Hiles, Oliver Dorn

Bibliographic record

VenueInverse Problems in Science and Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Canadian institutionsPrioris.ai (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegularization (linguistics)Shielded cableVoxelComputer scienceElectromagnetic fieldIterative reconstructionFocus (optics)AlgorithmInverse problemMathematicsArtificial intelligencePhysicsMathematical analysisOpticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel reconstruction scheme for the low-frequency near-field electromagnetic imaging of high-contrast conductivity distributions inside shielded regions using the system of Maxwell's equations in 3D. In our novel scheme, we focus on estimating the shape characteristics of the electrical conductivity profile inside these regions from low-frequency electromagnetic data measured at external locations for a single frequency. We introduce a colour level set regularization scheme which is a shape-based approach focusing on the simultaneous reconstruction of several shape-like distributions of different conductivity values in the same region of interest. Using two numerical experiments addressing a three-value reconstruction problem related to the imaging of shielded boxes or cargo containers, we compare this novel approach with results obtained from standard voxel-based reconstruction schemes on the one hand and the more established two-value shape-based approach on the other hand. We demonstrate that, depending on the particular situation of the imaging setup, this three-value (or in general multiple-value) shape-based reconstruction technique has the potential to provide superior reconstruction results in many situations, in particular regarding reconstruction of the correct shapes. We also discuss particular challenges of this novel methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInverse Problems in Science and EngineeringSame topicElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyFrench-language works237,207