Geographic Variation in Access to Pathology and Laboratory Services in Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Geospatial Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE Increasing noncommunicable disease burden in sub-Saharan Africa requires the urgent scale-up of pathology and laboratory medicine (PALM) services. To identify service gaps at the district level, we studied geographic variation in the correlation between travel time to health facilities and population density. METHODS We linked geospatial data for Tanzania from multiple sources. Facility locations were extracted from a comprehensive facility list in Africa. Data on geographic factors, demographics, and roads were collected from government and nonprofit databases. We classified facilities assuming increasing PALM service readiness by level: dispensaries, health centers, district hospitals, and regional/referral hospitals. We input these data into the AccessMod 5 algorithm to estimate travel time across Tanzania with 1-km resolution for each PALM classification. We then calculated district-level averages of population and travel time for each PALM category. Associations between these variables were estimated using a bivariable local indicator of spatial autocorrelation, specifying immediate contiguity neighborhood definition. Spatial analysis was restricted to 172 contiguous districts (islands not included). Significance tests were two sided, with an α of .05. RESULTS Analysis included 5,342 dispensaries, 667 health centers, 185 district hospitals, and 34 regional/referral hospitals. Maps revealed clusters of estimated travel time in excess of 6 hours in less populated western and southern districts. More districts reported an average travel time of less than 1 hour to the nearest dispensary (69%) than to regional/referral hospitals (16%). Bivariable local indicators of spatial autocorrelation revealed few significant clusters of spatial correlations; however, significant correlations between low population density and longer travel times in neighboring districts were obtained for 13%, 16%, 15%, and 13% of districts for dispensaries, health centers, district hospitals, and regional/referral hospitals, respectively. CONCLUSION Limited variability of district-level spatial correlations suggests somewhat equitable geographic allocation of PALM services in Tanzania, with small areas of low population density and long travel times that demand additional intervention. Limitations include a lack of ascertainment of specific PALM services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".