MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045796617 · doi:10.1063/5.0014476

Exact solutions to steady radial flow in a porous medium with variable permeability

2020· article· en· W3045796617 on OpenAlexaff
Yana Nec, Greg Huculak

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsThompson Rivers University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorous mediumPhysicsPermeability (electromagnetism)MechanicsPlanarRADIUSIdeal gasFlow (mathematics)Domain (mathematical analysis)Exact solutions in general relativityTraveling wavePorosityMathematical analysisGeotechnical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A wide class of exact solutions to equations of steady flow of ideal gas in a porous medium is obtained in a planar annular domain comprising sectors of distinct permeabilities. The formulation involves an unconventional Sturm–Liouville problem. The class also admits solutions to configurations with respective distinct generation rates. The solutions are expected to be applicable to landfill gas or natural gas extraction. The breaking of axial symmetry enables realistic modeling of the radius of influence for both horizontal and vertical wells. The analysis proves that the well’s reach would have an azimuthal dependence in any problem with a heterogeneous medium. Therefore, it is suggested that the concept of radius of influence as perceived today be revised.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicGroundwater flow and contamination studiesFrench-language works237,207