A Deep Learning Based Hybrid Approach for COVID-19 Disease Detections
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
COVID-19 appeared in December 19, 2019 in Wuhan, China. This disease has spread to almost all countries in a short time. Countries take a series of stringent measures, including the prohibition of going out to prevent the virus that spreads COVID-19 disease. In this paper, we aimed to diagnose COVID-19 disease from X_RAY images by using deep learning architectures. In addition, 96.30% accuracy rate has been achieved with the hybrid architecture we have improved. While developing the hybrid model, the last 5 layers of Resnet 50 architecture were ejected. 10 layers were added in place of the 5 layers that were removed. The count of layers, which is 177 in the Resnet50 architecture, has been increased to 182 in the hybrid model. Thanks to these layer changes made in Resnet50, the accuracy rate has been increased more. Classification was performed with AlexNet, Resnet50, GoogLeNet, VGG16 and developed hybrid architectures using COVID-19 Chest X-Ray dataset and Chest X-Ray images (Pneumonia) datasets. As a result, when other scientific works in the literature are examined, it is finalized that the improved hybrid method offers better results than other deep learning architectures and can be used in computer-aided systems to diagnose COVID-19 disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it