MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045907325 · doi:10.1109/jphot.2020.3012097

Automated Adaptation and Stabilization of a Tunable WDM Polarization-Independent Receiver on Active Silicon Photonic Platform

2020· article· en· W3045907325 on OpenAlexafffund
Minglei Ma, Hossam Shoman, Sudip Shekhar, Nicolas A. F. Jaeger, Lukas Chrostowski

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE photonics journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsWavelength-division multiplexingSilicon photonicsPhotonicsComputer scienceOptoelectronicsPolarization (electrochemistry)SiliconPolarization mode dispersionOptical performance monitoringOptical filterMaterials scienceOptical fiberTelecommunicationsChemistryWavelength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate automated adaptation, and stabilization of a silicon photonic wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM), polarization-independent receiver. A two-channel, tunable WDM polarization-independent receiver is designed, and used to demonstrate automated WDM polarization control. Using a control algorithm based on Barzilai, and Borwein's two-point step size gradient descent method, we realize automated polarization adaptation, and wavelength stabilization for two arbitrarily polarized input data streams. 10 Gb/s on-off keying, and 20 Gb/s pulse-amplitude modulation 4-level formats are generated as the high-speed input data streams. In addition, we implement a long-duration experiment, in which we measure the bit-error-ratio for continuously varying polarization states, and changing chip temperatures. The experimental results show that, with the automated control, the WDM polarization-independent receiver can adapt, stabilize, and track the arbitrary input polarization states from a standard optical fiber into the transverse electric mode of a silicon waveguide, and simultaneously stabilize the transmitted wavelength channels at various chip temperatures. We also show how the presented WDM polarization-independent receiver scales with N channels, and propose an improved design for large-scale WDM applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE photonics journalSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207