MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046003662 · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2077-3

A large-scale binding and functional map of human RNA-binding proteins

2020· article· en· W3046003662 on OpenAlexaff
Eric L. Van Nostrand, Peter Freese, Henry Pratt, Xiaofeng Wang, Xintao Wei, Rui Xiao, Steven M. Blue, Jiayu Chen, Neal Cody, Daniel Domínguez, Sara Olson, Balaji Sundararaman, Lijun Zhan, Cassandra Bazile, Louis Philip Benoit Bouvrette, Julie Bergalet, Michael O. Duff, Keri E. Garcia, Chelsea Gelboin-Burkhart, Myles Hochman, Nicole Lambert, Hairi Li, Michael P. McGurk, Thai B. Nguyen, Tsultrim Palden, Ines Rabano, Shashank Sathe, Rebecca Stanton, Amanda Su, Ruth Wang, Brian A. Yee, Bing Zhou, Ashley L. Louie, Stefan Aigner, Xiang‐Dong Fu, Éric Lécuyer, Christopher B. Burge, Brenton R. Graveley, G Yeo

Bibliographic record

VenueNature · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research Institute
FundersNational Human Genome Research InstituteDamon Runyon Cancer Research FoundationNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsRNA-binding proteinRNABiologyRNA splicingPolyadenylationComputational biologyGeneticsBinding siteHuman genomeGeneGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

. Here we introduce a new data set of RNA elements in the human genome that are recognized by RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), generated as part of the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project phase III. This class of regulatory elements functions only when transcribed into RNA, as they serve as the binding sites for RBPs that control post-transcriptional processes such as splicing, cleavage and polyadenylation, and the editing, localization, stability and translation of mRNAs. We describe the mapping and characterization of RNA elements recognized by a large collection of human RBPs in K562 and HepG2 cells. Integrative analyses using five assays identify RBP binding sites on RNA and chromatin in vivo, the in vitro binding preferences of RBPs, the function of RBP binding sites and the subcellular localization of RBPs, producing 1,223 replicated data sets for 356 RBPs. We describe the spectrum of RBP binding throughout the transcriptome and the connections between these interactions and various aspects of RNA biology, including RNA stability, splicing regulation and RNA localization. These data expand the catalogue of functional elements encoded in the human genome by the addition of a large set of elements that function at the RNA level by interacting with RBPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,381
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNatureSame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207