Bibliographic record
Abstract
SC-Flip (SCF) decoding algorithm shares the attention with the common polar code decoding approaches due to its low-complexity and improved error-correction performance. However, the inefficient criterion for locating the correct bit-flipping position in SCF decoding limits its improvements. Due to its improved bit-flipping criterion, Thresholded SCF (TSCF) decoding algorithm exhibits a superior error-correction performance and lower computational complexity than SCF decoding. However, the parameters of TSCF decoding depend on multiple channel and code parameters, and are obtained via Monte-Carlo simulations. Our main goal is to realize TSCF decoding as a practical polar decoder implementation. To this end, we first realize an approximated threshold value that is independent of the code parameters and precomputations. The proposed approximation has negligible error-correction performance degradation on the TSCF decoding. Then, we validate an alternative approach for forming a critical set that does not require precomputations, which also paves the way to the implementation of the Fast-TSCF decoder. Compared to the existing fast SCF implementations, the proposed Fast-TSCF decoder has $0.24$ to $0.41$ dB performance gain at frame error rate of $10^{-3}$, without any extra cost. Compared to the TSCF decoding, Fast-TSCF does not depend on precomputations and requires $87\%$ fewer decoding steps. Finally, implementation results in TSMC 65nm CMOS technology show that the Fast-TSCF decoder is $20\%$ and $82\%$ more area-efficient than the state-of-the-art fast SCF and fast SC-List decoder architectures, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".