Estudio comparativo de tres bebidas formuladas con jícama (Smallanthus sonchifolius)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se formularon tres bebidas combinando jícama con piña, babaco y maracuyá con el objeto de proporcionar un valor agregado al uso tradicional de la jícama y posteriormente evaluar la calidad nutritiva de las mismas, para esto se realizaron los análisis físico químicos y microbiológicos determinándose pH, °Brix, acidez titulable, proteína, azucares totales, coliformes totales, aerobios mesófilos. Se utilizó un DCA y se aplicó la prueba estadística de Tukey con un niel de significancia p≤0,05 , encontrándose que las propiedades nutricionales del jugo de jícama con maracuyá presentaron mejores resultados por su valor nutritivo 11,50 °Brix, 3,82 pH, 13,19% acidez total, 0,54 % de proteína, 0,78 % cenizas y 38,62 % azucares totales Las tres formulaciones presentaron bajas cargas microbiológicas para mesófilos y coliformes que no superan los límites máximos permitidos por las normas INEN NTE 2337 para Jugos, pulpas, concentrados, néctares, bebidas de frutas y vegetales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it