MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046128621 · doi:10.1364/oe.400130

Efficient radiative transfer model for thermal infrared brightness temperature simulation in cloudy atmospheres

2020· article· en· W3046128621 on OpenAlexaff
Wenwen Li, Feng Zhang, Yi‐Ning Shi, Hironobu Iwabuchi, Mingwei Zhu, Jiangnan Li, Wei Han, Husi Letu, Hiroshi Ishimoto

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRadiative transferAtmospheric radiative transfer codesBrightness temperatureBrightnessMODTRANInfraredInfrared windowRadianceComputational physicsAtmospheric modelPhysicsIce cloudOpticsMaterials scienceRemote sensingMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An efficient radiative transfer model (ERTM) is developed to simulate thermal infrared brightness temperatures observed by the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) in this study. The ERTM contains an alternate mapping correlated k-distribution (AMCKD) scheme, a parameterization for cloud optical property, and a rapid infrared radiative transfer scheme. The AMCKD is employed to calculate the gaseous absorption in the inhomogeneous thermodynamic atmosphere. The optical properties of clouds are parameterized by the effective length for ice clouds based on the Voronoi model, and by the effective radius for water clouds based on the Lorenz-Mie theory. The adding method of four-stream discrete ordinates method (4DDA) is extended to be able to calculate the thermal infrared radiative intensity varying with the zenith angle in ERTM. The efficiency and accuracy of ERTM are evaluated by comparing with the benchmark model which is composed of discrete ordinate radiative transfer (DISORT) and line-by-line radiative transfer model (LBLRTM). Under the standard atmospheric profiles, the root mean square error (RMSE) of simulated brightness temperatures reaches a maximum of 0.21K at the B16 (13.28 µm) channel of AHI. The computational efficiency of ERTM is approximately five orders of magnitude higher than that of the benchmark model. Moreover, the simulated brightness temperatures by ERTM are highly consistent with the rigorous results and AHI observations in the application to the Typhoon Mujigae case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsFrench-language works237,207