MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046130006 · doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000001480

Which Patients Should Have Early Surgical Intervention for Acute Ureteric Colic? Reply.

2020· letter· en· W3046130006 on OpenAlexaffabout
Grant Innes, Andrew D. McRae, Joel M.H. Teichman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHernia repair and management
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFoothillsIntervention (counseling)Renal colicFamily medicineEmergency departmentGeneral surgeryAlternative medicineNursingPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No AccessJournal of UrologyLetters to the Editor1 Jun 2021Which Patients Should Have Early Surgical Intervention for Acute Ureteric Colic? Reply. is a reply to letterWhich Patients Should Have Early Surgical Intervention for Acute Ureteric Colic? Letter. Grant D. Innes, Andrew D. McRae, and Joel M.H. Teichman Grant D. InnesGrant D. Innes Departments of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine Foothills Medical Centre Calgary, Alberta, Canada More articles by this author , Andrew D. McRaeAndrew D. McRae Departments of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine Foothills Medical Centre Calgary, Alberta, Canada More articles by this author , and Joel M.H. TeichmanJoel M.H. Teichman Department of Urologic Sciences and Department of Emergency Medicine St. Paul’s Hospital Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001480AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Which Patients Should Have Early Surgical Intervention for Acute Ureteric Colic? Reply. ." The Journal of Urology, 205(6), p. 1847 © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesJournal of UrologyNov 12, 2020, 12:00:00 AMWhich Patients Should Have Early Surgical Intervention for Acute Ureteric Colic? Letter. Volume 205Issue 6June 2021Page: 1847-1847 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Grant D. Innes Departments of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine Foothills Medical Centre Calgary, Alberta, Canada More articles by this author Andrew D. McRae Departments of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine Foothills Medical Centre Calgary, Alberta, Canada More articles by this author Joel M.H. Teichman Department of Urologic Sciences and Department of Emergency Medicine St. Paul’s Hospital Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0330.029
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicHernia repair and managementFrench-language works237,207