MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046221142 · doi:10.11159/eee20.103

Reconfigurable Filter Design Using Novel Resonators

2020· article· en· W3046221142 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ayşe Nihan Basmaci, Ceyhun Karpuz, Fatih Tulumbaci

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResonatorComputer scienceElectronic engineeringFilter (signal processing)Prototype filterFilter designOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structure proposed in this study is basically a meander-shaped resonator structure.By changing certain parameters determined on this structure, the filtering characteristics can be adjusted.For instance, the bandpass filtering characteristic can be adjusted as elliptical or linear phase by means of adjustments made in the value of the capacitor added to the structure.The effects of coupling and perturbation level on the frequency response in the proposed structure are also investigated.If the coupling level is not sufficient, the filter does not respond.In the proposed filter structure, the filtering characteristic can be adjusted by changing the capacity value.The structure can be reconfigurable with the adjustments made on the main transmission line of the structure, allowing the transition of the structure from the band-pass filtering characteristic to the band-stop filtering characteristic.Moreover, by increasing the capacity value the frequency response can be also switched from single mode to dual mode.The simulations in this study were performed with the help of SONNET SOFTWARE, a full-wave EM (Electro-Magnetic) simulator package program.Theoretical analysis of the proposed filter performed by obtaining the equivalent circuit model of the proposed structure.Scattering and ABCD matrix of the proposed structure are also extracted to clarify the filter topology.A reconfigurable microwave filter is designed, simulated and analysed theoretically.It should be noted that, simulation results and theoretically obtained results are in a very good agreement with the predicted results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and ScienceSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207