MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046223769 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2020.3010308

Generic Wireless Power Transfer and Data Communication System Based on a Novel Modulation Technique

2020· article· en· W3046223769 on OpenAlexafffund
Aref Trigui, Sami Hached, Jean‐Pierre David, Ahmed Chiheb Ammari, Yvon Savaria, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Power Transfer Systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDemodulationElectronic engineeringModulation (music)Computer scienceData transmissionMaximum power transfer theoremWirelessPower (physics)Electrical engineeringEngineeringComputer hardwareTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a wireless power and downlink data transfer system for medical implants operating over a single 10 MHz inductive link. The system is based on a Carrier Width Modulation (CWM) scheme for high-speed communication and efficient power delivery using a novel modulator circuit design. Unlike conventional modulation techniques, the data rate of the proposed CWM is not limited by the quality factors of the primary and secondary coils. The functionality of the new modulation method is proven using a hybrid implementation comprising a custom-integrated demodulator circuit and board-level discrete components. The proposed Wireless Power and Data Transfer (WPDT) system is also capable of operating under a wide range of data rates. It allows a maximum data rate of 3.33 Mb/s for a maximum power delivery of 6.1 mW at 1 cm coils separation distance. The system can recover more power, reaching 55 mW at 100 kb/s. Due to the system genericity, an operator can select the best compromise between power and data rates in accordance to application or current need, without reconfiguring the receiver. Another advantage of this modulation technique is the simple implementation and the ultra-low power consumption of the CWM demodulator despite its high-speed demodulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicWireless Power Transfer SystemsFrench-language works237,207