MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046224204 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2019-0611

Méthodes de calcul avec réseaux de tenseurs en physique

2020· article· fr· W3046224204 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Thomas E. Baker, Samuel Desrosiers, Maxime Tremblay, Martin P. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum many-body systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article se veut un survol des réseaux de tenseurs et s’adresse aux débutants en la matière. Nous y mettons l’accent sur les outils nécessaires à l’implémentation concrète d’algorithmes. Quatre opérations de base (remodelage, permutation d’indices, contraction et décomposition) qui sont couramment utilisées dans les algorithmes de réseaux de tenseurs y sont décrites. Y seront aussi couverts la notation diagrammatique, intrication, les états en produit de matrices (MPS), les opérateurs en produit de matrices (MPO), état projeté de paires intriquées (PEPS), l’approche par renormalisation d’enchevêtrement multi-échelle (MERA), la décimation par bloc d’évolution temporelle (TEBD) et le groupe de renormalisation de tenseurs (TRG).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicQuantum many-body systemsFrench-language works237,207