PENGARUH KUALITAS LAYANAN TERHADAP KEPUASAN PELANGGAN DEPOT ISI ULANG AIR GALON ANDERE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to determine the service quality of the Andere Gallon Water Refill Depot, Angata Sub-district, South Konawe Regency to customer satisfaction. The type of this study is a quantitative descriptive. Data collection techniques carried out through literature study and field research in the form of observations, questionnaires, agency data, and documentation. The number of samples used 100 people chosen at random. The analytical method used Linear Regression method. The results of this study showed that the service quality indicator at the Andere gallon water refill depot, Angata Sub-district, South Konawe Regency was good because of high percentage, especially the responsiveness indicator (responsiveness). Customer satisfication at the Andere gallon water refill depot, Angata Sub-district South Konawe Regency was good because the quality of service was higher than customer satisfication which means customers of the Andere water refill gallon, Angata Sub-district of South Konawe regency was very satisfied about the service. Effect of service quality to customer satisfaction, from the regression model the result was obtained significant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".