ON-ROAD INFORMATION EXTRACTION FROM LIDAR DATA VIA MULTIPLE FEATURE MAPS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. On-road information, including road boundaries, road markings, and road cracks, provides significant guidance or warning to all road users. Recently, the on-road information extraction from LiDAR data have been widely studied. However, for the LiDAR data with lower accuracy and higher noise, some detailed information, such as road boundary, is difficult to be extracted correctly. Furthermore, most of previous studies lack an exploration of efficiently extracting multiple on-road information from a single framework. In this paper, we propose a new framework that can simultaneously extract multiple on-road information from high accuracy LiDAR data and can also more robustly extract detailed road boundaries from low accuracy LiDAR data. First, we propose a Curb-Aware Ground Filter to extract ground points with rich curb structure features. Second, we transform the vertical density, elevation gradient and intensity features of the ground points into multiple feature maps and extract multiple on-road information from the feature maps by employing a semantic segmentation network. Experimental results on three datasets with different data accuracy demonstrate that our method outperforms other recent competitive methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".