MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046276070 · doi:10.1145/3377929.3390007

DarwiNN

2020· article· en· W3046276070 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceToolboxLeverage (statistics)Cloud computingInferenceKernel (algebra)NeuroevolutionDeep neural networksArtificial intelligenceComputationDeep learningVariety (cybernetics)Artificial neural networkDistributed computingMachine learningTheoretical computer scienceParallel computingAlgorithmProgramming languageOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuroevolution (NE), defined as the application of evolution-based training methods to Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), has recently demonstrated encouraging results on a variety of learning tasks. NE is highly parallel and relies on DNN inference as its main computational kernel and therefore can potentially leverage large-scale distributed inference-specific hardware infrastructure in the cloud or edge. We introduce chromosome updates (CU), a novel communication-optimized method for distributing NE computation, and DarwiNN, an open-source, GPU-accelerated distributed NE toolbox based on PyTorch, which implements CU and other algorithms for distributing NE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEvolutionary Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207