Tree-ring lignin proxies in Larix gmelinii forest growing in a permafrost area of northeastern China: Temporal variation and potential for climate reconstructions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hydrogen and carbon stable isotope ratios (δ 2 H LM and δ 13 C LM values) of tree-ring lignin methoxy groups have recently been recognized as valuable palaeoclimate indicators. However, the environmental factors but also sample preparation processes that might cause variations of δ 2 H LM and δ 13 C LM values have been not fully explored. Furthermore, the temporal dynamics of wood lignin content on both isotopes hasn’t been investigated. To investigate the effects of total lignin content, removal of lipids and differences between individual and pooled tree-ring series on isotopic values, we analyzed ring samples of dominant Larix gmelinii trees from a typical permafrost region of northeastern China. We also examined relationships between δ 2 H LM and δ 13 C LM values with annual-resolution lignin content and climatic parameters over the common period of overlap 1901 to 2013. We found that the inter-tree variability between the individual and pooled isotopic chronologies was consistent, and the removal of lipids did not change the results of stable isotope measurements. The total lignin content shifted between the heartwood and sapwood , whereas the content of guaiacyl monomers (G-lignin), the only donor of methoxy groups, remained constant. Correlations analysis between lignin proxies and climate variables indicated that the heartwood total lignin content was positively correlated with the intrinsic water-use efficiency, temperature and vapor-pressure deficit (VPD), but negatively with the early-growing-season standardized precipitation evaporation index. Whilst δ 2 H LM values were positively correlated with the growing season temperature (May to August) and VPD , particularly in August, δ 13 C LM series showed insignificant correlation. Therefore, we suggest that the total lignin content and δ 2 H LM values of tree rings (both individual and pooled series) are suitable for tracking environment dynamics, as they can reveal the climate responses of tree growth .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".