GlycA Levels during the Earliest Stages of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Potential Use as a Biomarker of Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed at evaluating the clinical relevance of glycoprotein profiles during the earliest phases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as biomarkers of cardiovascular (CV) risk and treatment response. Then, GlycA and GlycB serum levels were measured using 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance in 82 early RA patients, 14 clinically-suspect arthralgia (CSA), and 28 controls. Serum glycosyltransferase activity was assessed by a colorimetric assay. Subclinical CV disease was assessed by Doppler-ultrasound. We found that GlycA and GlycB serum levels were increased in RA (both p < 0.001), but not in CSA, independently of cardiometabolic risk factors. Increased serum glycosyltransferase activity paralleled GlycA (r = 0.405, p < 0.001) and GlycB levels (r = 0.327, p = 0.005) in RA. GlycA, but not GlycB, was associated with atherosclerosis occurrence (p = 0.012) and severity (p = 0.001). Adding GlycA to the mSCORE improved the identification of patients with atherosclerosis over mSCORE alone, increasing sensitivity (29.7 vs. 68.0%) and accuracy (55.8 vs. 76.6%) and allowing reclassification into more appropriate risk categories. GlycA-reclassification identified patients with impaired lipoprotein metabolism. Finally, baseline GlycA levels predicted poor clinical response upon anti-rheumatic treatment at 6 and 12 months in univariate and multivariate analysis. In sum, increased GlycA levels during the earliest stage of RA can be considered a powerful biomarker for CV risk stratification and treatment response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".