Leo Tolstoy and Russian Peasant Sectarian Writers. Selected Correspondence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Andrew Donskov, ed. Tolstoy and Russian Peasant Sectarian Selected Correspondence. Tolstoy Series, vol. 8. Ottawa: Slavic Research Group at the University of Ottawa, 2008. 298 pp. Illustrations. Bibliography. Indexes. $20.00, paper.This volume features in English translation selected correspondence between Lev Tolstoi and four of the major Russian peasant sectarian writers: Timofei Bondarev, the Molokan Fedor Zheltov, the Doukhobor Petr V. Verigin, and Mikhail Novikov. The Russian texts of all four sets of correspondence have appeared in the last decade in Russian, Canadian, and German publications, and, except for the Bondarev letters, which appear in English here for the first time, John Woodsworth's translations of the correspondence have previously been published in the United States and Canada. his preface, the editor informs the reader that all the Russian texts translated in the collection were verified against the manuscripts, a process that helped to correct many earlier oversights and misreadings.The annotated letters, presented in their context of a dialogue, are preceded by Donskov's ninety-three page introduction entitled Leo Tolstoy and Russian Peasant Sectarian Writers. Illustrations include portraits of the five correspondents, a handwritten page from Tolstoi's treatise V chem moia vera [What I Believe], and the front cover of the 1989 publication of this work in Tula. The index of Tolstoi titles, listing the English and then the Russian title, is followed by an index of names.The first part of Donskov's introduction briefly traces the literary interest in the peasant in Russia in the nineteenth century and highlights the role of the peasantry in Tolstoi's writing, his educational and publishing ventures, and his philosophy. Tolstoi's interest in the peasant sectarians and his support of them is examined against the backdrop of persecution by church and government authorities. Donskov then considers Tolstoi's relation with each of the four sectarian writers featured in this volume; prior to his discussion of Tolstoi and Zheltov, Donskov presents a brief outline of the Molokans and, similarly, an outline of the Doukhobors precedes the discussion on Tolstoi and Verigin.The Tolstoi-Bondarev correspondence (1885-1 898) comprises five letters written by the former and seven by the latter. The most prominent topic of discussion is Bondarev 's treatise entitled Torzhestvo zemledel'tsa Ui trudoliubie i tuneiadstvo [The Triumph of the Land-tiller, or Industriousness and Idleness] and his commitment to the Genesis 3:19 injunction: In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread. . .; for Bondarev, only obethence to this original law, that is, through honest manual labour, could sin be avoided. While scornful of the kid-gloved elite, Bondarev was also committed to fighting the peasants' shortcomings, especially drunkenness. The selected letters touch on Bondarev's Sabbatarian connection, speak eloquently of the strength and comfort he derived from Tolstoi's support, and reveal the delightful logic of his thought process. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".