MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Microbial abundance and transport in glacial near-surface meltwater

2020· article· en· W3046439362 on OpenAlexaff
I.T. Stevens, Tristram Irvine‐Fynn, Arwyn Edwards, Philip R. Porter, Joseph M. Cook, Tom Holt, Brian J. Moorman, Andy Hodson, Andrew C. Mitchell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiogeochemical cycleMeltwaterGlacierWeatheringChemistryGeologyEnvironmental chemistryGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glacier surfaces are active microbial ecosystems which contribute to melt feedback cycles and biogeochemical processes. Despite this recognition, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the transport dynamics and residence time of microbes in this supraglacial habitat. Throughout the ablation season, meltwater is generated across a glacier’s surface and flows through the porous near-surface weathering crust before entering the channelised supraglacial network. Within the weathering crust, solar radiation provides a “photic zone” which, combined with nutrient availability, is conducive for microbial activity. The water flow through this porous near-surface layer provides a transport mechanism for these microbes. However, the nature of controls upon this phenomenon remain unexplored, despite the relevance for cellular export to downstream ecosystems, glacier surface albedo and biogeochemical cycling. To determine potential controls on microbial transport in the weathering crust, we present 913 measurements of microbial cell abundance in supraglacial meltwaters from 11 glaciers across the northern hemisphere. Each measurement is coupled with weathering crust hydraulic conductivity or stream discharge. These data reveal a mean microbial abundance of 2.2 × 104 cells mL-1 (with a range of 103 – 106) in supraglacial meltwaters within the weathering crust and stream channels. Modal microbe size was 1 – 2 μm (56 % of microbes), with 89 % of microbes smaller than 4 μm. No substantiated difference in size distributions between weathering crust and stream meltwaters were observed. No correlation between microbial abundance and near-surface hydraulic conductivity or stream discharge were observed, either across the entire dataset or when considered on a glacier-by-glacier basis. At three glaciers, water temperature and electrical conductivity (a proxy measure for ionic load) were also recorded; but we observe no correlation between these two variables and microbial abundance. Our data suggests weathering crust microbe abundance is consistent across differing glacial environments, and the concentrations entrained in the near-surface equal those seen in supraglacial streams. As such, despite the low transfer rate of meltwater, there appears to be limited evidence for substantial storage or accumulation of biomass in the near-surface weathering crust. Moreover, microbe entrainment does not appear to be driven by primary hydrological controls. Assuming that once liberated within the weathering crust entrained microbes reach channelised supraglacial networks, we estimate a delivery of 1.1 × 109 kg C a-1 to downstream environments globally (excluding Antarctica) to 2100, using existing discharge forecasts. This study represents a crucial first step in examining microbial abundance within, and transport across glacier surfaces and their potential role in biogeochemical process-feedbacks and the inoculation of downstream environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→