Indigenous Youth in Australia and Canada: A Modern Narrative of Settler/Colonial Relationships through Indigenous Rap Music
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Researching Indigenous youth and their connections to Hip Hop culture and Indigenous cultures is rather a new way of researching the voice of Indigenous youth. This thesis looks to answer questions about this culture drawing on a range of local knowledges as well as those that surpass our community boundaries and explore the regional, national and international realm. The research is twofold. The first is about methodology. An Indigenous Research methodology has been developed and is important to the research as it holds the values and worldviews of Indigenous ways of being. It is a solid form of Indigenous Knowledge production. This leads the first and encompassing question: “Can an Indigenous Research Methodology be used in a global context?” The second part of the research is based on the question “How are Indigenous youth from Canada and Australia articulating a modern narrative of settler/colonial relationships through Indigenous Rap Music?” Based on a mixed method encompassing a survey, interviews, ethnography, auto-ethnography the thesis examines a range of young people who listen to, perform and create rap. It sets out the stories in relation to concepts of resistance, reconciliation, and sovereignty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".