MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046555320 · doi:10.1080/10749039.2020.1775853

Responding to LCHC’s polyphonic autobiography: Studying rocks in a landslide and the creation of new, more humane forms of LCHC’s own activity

2020· article· en· W3046555320 on OpenAlexaff
Beth Ferholt, Natalia Gajdamaschko

Bibliographic record

VenueMind Culture and Activity · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEducation, Healthcare and Sociology Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyphonyLandslideBiographyGeologyArtArt historyGeomorphologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Doing social science … is like being a geologist who studies rocks in a landslide.– Roy D’Andrade (as cited in Cole, 1995, p. 190)The acid test of the theory is its success in guiding the construct...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.019
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMind Culture and ActivitySame topicEducation, Healthcare and Sociology ResearchFrench-language works237,207