MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046635873 · doi:10.1163/22141332-00704008-14

Jesuits and the Natural Sciences in Modern Times, 1814–2014, written by Agustín Udías

2020· article· en· W3046635873 on OpenAlex
Jean-Olivier Richard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Jesuit Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsInstitut Philippe Pinel de MontréalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpirePortugueseViewpointsHistoryColonialismNatural resourceArgument (complex analysis)Metropolitan areaSocial scienceAncient historyGeographySociologyPolitical scienceArchaeologyArtPhilosophyLawVisual artsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pinheiro Mourão's Tratado único das bexigas, e sarampo (Lisbon, 1683), or João Curvo Semedo's collection Polyanthea medicinal (Lisbon, 1697).Examining the concern common to the treatises (the description and cure of tropical fevers), Cagle highlights the congruence of viewpoints held by metropolitan doctors.In these, he finds support for his argument for a unity in a cohesive intertropical world and for an ecological, environmental, and epidemiological coherence which, in the Portuguese empire, was described from Asia to the Atlantic.As he concludes in the Epilogue: "it took two centuries to assemble the tropics" (306).Pleasant to read and extensively annotated, revealing an analysis of a vast and specialized bibliography and profound archival research, Assembling the Tropics: Science and Medicine in Portugal's Empire, 1450-1700, is a stimulating read and an interesting working resource for those who, in their research, seek an innovative perspective on the knowledge of the colonial natural world and the healing arts practiced in the Portuguese empire up to the dawn of the 1700s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it