Heart, lungs, and muscle interplay in worsening activity-related breathlessness in advanced cardiopulmonary disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Activity-related breathlessness is a key determinant of poor quality of life in patients with advanced cardiorespiratory disease. Accordingly, palliative care has assumed a prominent role in their care. The severity of breathlessness depends on a complex combination of negative cardiopulmonary interactions and increased afferent stimulation from systemic sources. We review recent data exposing the seeds and consequences of these abnormalities in combined heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). RECENT FINDINGS: The drive to breathe increases ('excessive breathing') secondary to an enlarged dead space and hypoxemia (largely COPD-related) and heightened afferent stimuli, for example, sympathetic overexcitation, muscle ergorreceptor activation, and anaerobic metabolism (largely heart failure-related). Increased ventilatory drive might not be fully translated into the expected lung-chest wall displacement because of the mechanical derangements brought by COPD ('inappropriate breathing'). The latter abnormalities, in turn, negatively affect the central hemodynamics which are already compromised by heart failure. Physical activity then decreases, worsening muscle atrophy and dysfunction. SUMMARY: Beyond the imperative of optimal pharmacological treatment of each disease, strategies to lessen ventilation (e.g., walking aids, oxygen, opiates and anxiolytics, and cardiopulmonary rehabilitation) and improve mechanics (heliox, noninvasive ventilation, and inspiratory muscle training) might mitigate the burden of this devastating symptom in advanced heart failure-COPD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".