Digit identity matters: origin and evolution of sexual dimorphism in the digit lengths of tropidurid lizards
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Sexual dimorphism in digit lengths reflects phenotypic evolution mediated by developmental steroids. Differences in the identity of the sexually-dimorphic digit may evolve if the concentrations of sex-steroid receptors in the digit are easily modified and the initial changes have low impact on fitness. Accordingly, sexual dimorphism in digit lengths might initially originate under neutral selective regimes, being subsequently co-opted by embryonic hormonal effects on sensitive traits that are more likely to be targeted by selection. Correlated variation among sexually-dimorphic traits might therefore reflect pleiotropic hormonal modulation during development. Moreover, the identity and trend of the sexually-dimorphic digit might be evolutionarily labile even among closely-related species. We evaluated this model by assessing the identity of sexually-dimorphic digits among 11 Tropiduridae lizard species and inferring evolutionary patterns of sexual dimorphism. Assuming that digit lengths can be used as a proxy for hormonal modulation of steroid-sensitive traits during development, we tested for evolutionary associations among sexual dimorphism of digit lengths, body size and other traits that may be direct targets of sexual selection in the Tropiduridae. Sexual dimorphism in digit lengths is evolutionarily labile in the Tropiduridae, and diversity, instead of conservatism, seems to rule developmental mechanisms underlying the evolution of sexual dimorphism in digit ratios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it