MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046659318 · doi:10.20382/jocg.v10i1a17

Interesting paths in the mapper complex

2018· article· en· W3046659318 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ananth Kalyanaraman, Methun Kamruzzaman, Bala Krishnamoorthy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Geometry (Carleton University) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsPath (computing)GraphEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionData pointBinary numberFunction (biology)Variable (mathematics)AlgorithmComputer scienceMathematical analysisArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a high dimensional point cloud of data with functions defined on the points, the mapper algorithm produces a compact summary in the form of a simplicial complex connecting the points. This summary offers insightful data visualizations, which have been employed in applications to identify subsets of points, i.e., subpopulations, with interesting properties. These subpopulations typically appear as long paths, flares (i.e., branching paths), or loops in the mapper complex. We study the problem of quantifying the interestingness of subpopulations in a given mapper complex. First, we create a weighted directed graph G=(V,E) using the 1-skeleton of the mapper complex. We use the average values at the vertices (i.e., clusters) of the target function (i.e., a dependent variable) to direct the edges from low to high values. We set the difference between the average values at the vertices (high-low) as the weight of the edge. Covariation of the remaining h functions (i.e., independent variables) is captured by a h-bit binary signature assigned to the edge. An interesting path in G is a directed path whose edges all have the same signature. Further, we define the interestingness score of such a path as a sum of its edge weights multiplied by a nonlinear function of their corresponding ranks, i.e., the depths of the edges along the path. Such a nonlinear function could model application use-cases where the growth in the dependent variable values is expected to be concentrated in specific intervals of a path, e.g., plant growth accelerating later in the season, or a terminally ill patient's health condition deteriorating rapidly toward the end. Second, we study three optimization problems on this graph G to quantify interesting subpopulations. In the problem MaxIP, the goal is to find the most interesting path in G, i.e., an interesting path with the maximum interestingness score. For the case where G is a directed acyclic graph (DAG), which could be a typical setting in many applications, we show that MaxIP can be solved in polynomial time---in O(mnd_in) time and O(mn) space, where m,n, and d_in are the numbers of edges, vertices, and the maximum indegree of a vertex in G, respectively. In the more general problem IP, the goal is to find a collection of interesting paths that are edge-disjoint, and the sum of interestingness scores of all paths is maximized. We also study a variant of IP termed k-IP, where the goal is to identify a collection of edge-disjoint interesting paths each with k edges, and the total interestingness score of all paths is maximized. While k-IP can be solved in polynomial time for k <= 2, we show k-IP is NP-complete for k >= 3 even when G is a DAG. We develop heuristics for IP and k-IP on DAGs, which use the algorithm for MaxIP on DAGs as a subroutine, and run in O(mnd_in) and O(mkd_in) time for IP and k-IP, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational Geometry (Carleton University)Same topicData Management and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207