Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Given a high dimensional point cloud of data with functions defined on the points, the mapper algorithm produces a compact summary in the form of a simplicial complex connecting the points. This summary offers insightful data visualizations, which have been employed in applications to identify subsets of points, i.e., subpopulations, with interesting properties. These subpopulations typically appear as long paths, flares (i.e., branching paths), or loops in the mapper complex. We study the problem of quantifying the interestingness of subpopulations in a given mapper complex. First, we create a weighted directed graph G=(V,E) using the 1-skeleton of the mapper complex. We use the average values at the vertices (i.e., clusters) of the target function (i.e., a dependent variable) to direct the edges from low to high values. We set the difference between the average values at the vertices (high-low) as the weight of the edge. Covariation of the remaining h functions (i.e., independent variables) is captured by a h-bit binary signature assigned to the edge. An interesting path in G is a directed path whose edges all have the same signature. Further, we define the interestingness score of such a path as a sum of its edge weights multiplied by a nonlinear function of their corresponding ranks, i.e., the depths of the edges along the path. Such a nonlinear function could model application use-cases where the growth in the dependent variable values is expected to be concentrated in specific intervals of a path, e.g., plant growth accelerating later in the season, or a terminally ill patient's health condition deteriorating rapidly toward the end. Second, we study three optimization problems on this graph G to quantify interesting subpopulations. In the problem MaxIP, the goal is to find the most interesting path in G, i.e., an interesting path with the maximum interestingness score. For the case where G is a directed acyclic graph (DAG), which could be a typical setting in many applications, we show that MaxIP can be solved in polynomial time---in O(mnd_in) time and O(mn) space, where m,n, and d_in are the numbers of edges, vertices, and the maximum indegree of a vertex in G, respectively. In the more general problem IP, the goal is to find a collection of interesting paths that are edge-disjoint, and the sum of interestingness scores of all paths is maximized. We also study a variant of IP termed k-IP, where the goal is to identify a collection of edge-disjoint interesting paths each with k edges, and the total interestingness score of all paths is maximized. While k-IP can be solved in polynomial time for k <= 2, we show k-IP is NP-complete for k >= 3 even when G is a DAG. We develop heuristics for IP and k-IP on DAGs, which use the algorithm for MaxIP on DAGs as a subroutine, and run in O(mnd_in) and O(mkd_in) time for IP and k-IP, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it