A CAPACIDADE ESTRATÉGICA DO TRANSPORTE MARÍTIMO DE CARGAS NO BRASIL: CENÁRIOS, AMEAÇAS E OPORTUNIDADES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Almirante Mahan ja apontava que a projecao internacional de paises costeiros perpassa, necessariamente, pela capacidade estrategica desses estados sobre os fluxos do comercio internacional e do Transporte Maritimo de Cargas (TMC). Nesse sentido, frente a crescente atividade dos complexos logisticos internacionais portuarios, torna-se fundamental questionar: “Como a politica nacional pode contribuir, estrategicamente, com a melhor insercao internacional do Brasil via atividade maritima de cargas?” Assim, delineamos a seguinte metodologia, baseada na revisao bibliografica e coleta de dados quali quantitativos: tipificar as coalizoes e paradigmas no TMC; descrever o contexto atual da Marinha Mercante frente a politica nacional do TMC; realizar estudo comparado entre Brasil, EUA, China, Canada e Australia; e prospectar cenarios para acao. Identificou-se que a politica de TMC no Brasil e industrial nacional corporativa, ou seja, centralizada no governo federal e com baixa competitividade e insercao internacional. Ha forte tendencia ao paradigma industrial liberal. Estrategicamente, a politica nacional do TMC pode apoiar cenarios que favorecam a inclinacao para se tornar pos-industrial liberal ou pos-industrial nacional corporativa para melhor posicionamento internacional do pais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".