Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane/epoxy coatings: a review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, there is a need for a paradigm shift in material selection for surface coatings so as to meet the requirements of advanced systems. Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS) are three-dimensional networks with a silica-like core covered by an organic shell, a promising nanosized structure for organic coatings. The use of POSS structures in coating materials has experienced an almost erratic period over the past decade, mainly because of the synthesis of POSS being exclusive and, to some extent, expressive. However, there has been a big return to the use of POSS in coatings during the last years. Epoxy is best known for its versatility of usage as an organic coating. Hybrid organic–inorganic POSS nanostructures with unique properties are a complement to the epoxy for coating applications. The tailorable compatibility and considerable reactivity of POSS molecules towards organic groups have made them promising candidates for emerging multifunctional epoxy coatings. In this sense, the focus of this review is placed on POSS/epoxy nanocomposite coatings. The thermal, mechanical, anti-corrosion and dielectric properties of POSS/epoxy coatings have been comprehensively studied and discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it