MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Convergence of Particle Filter for Output Feedback Control

2020· article· en· W3046772140 on OpenAlex
Venkata Goutham Polisetty, Santhosh Kumar Varanasi, Phanindra Jampana

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvergence (economics)Control theory (sociology)Markov processParticle filterFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceNonlinear systemStochastic processPosterior probabilityProcess (computing)MathematicsApplied mathematicsControl (management)Bayesian probabilityArtificial intelligencePhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the existing literature, convergence results for particle filters are given explicitly only for the case when the underlying dynamic model is a Markov process. When output feedback control is used, the evolution of the state process is no longer Markovian due to the dependence of inputs on the outputs. In this paper, it is shown that the random probability measures produced by the particle filter converge to the true prior and posterior measures in this nonMarkovian case. Firstly, it is proved that the recursive equations relating the prior and posterior measures continue to hold for output feedback control. These recursive equations are then used to show the required convergence of the random measures. Finally, the convergence is also illustrated using simulations on a nonlinear dynamical system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it