MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046829471 · doi:10.11159/mhci20.106

Synthesis of Integral Photography Images from Raw Images CapturedUsing a Consumer Light Field Camera

2020· article· en· W3046829471 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kazuhisa Yanaka, Toshiaki Yamanouchi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotographyComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceComputer graphics (images)Computational photographyField (mathematics)Image processingImage (mathematics)MathematicsArtVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a new method to synthesize an integral photography image to be displayed on a flat panel display based on a raw image captured using a commercial light field camera. Among stereoscopic image display methods, Lippmann's integral photography has the advantage of producing a high sense of reality because parallax occurs in the horizontal and vertical directions. When a stereoscopic image for IP is produced via live action, a large-scale camera system is typically required. By contrast, a commercial light field camera is portable and can record the intensity and direction of incident light by stacking a microlens array on a high-definition image sensor. However, a raw image obtained from the light field camera cannot be directly used for IP. We solve this problem by introducing conversion between IP images. We develop an experimental system for synthesizing images for IP from a raw image captured using a commercial light field camera (Lytro A1). Results confirm that an autostereoscopic image with horizontal and vertical parallax is displayed when observing the image using a fly's eye lens on a PC screen. The amount of popping out or sinking can be controlled by changing the parameters of the program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and ScienceSame topicComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207