Nephrocalcinosis and Renal Dysfunction in Pediatric Intestinal Failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Outcomes of pediatric intestinal failure (PIF) have improved recently, with other comorbidities, such as increased echogenicity/nephrocalcinosis on ultrasound (US) in long-term survivors now evident. We evaluated the significance of nephrocalcinosis over time in PIF and its impact on renal function. METHODS: Retrospective analysis on a cohort of PIF patients was performed. Presence of nephrocalcinosis and/or increased renal echogenicity (identified on US), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; ml · min · 1.73 m2), renal tubular function, PN volume (ml · kg · day) and PN exposure time (hours/day) were reviewed annually over a follow-up period of 2 years. Outcomes in the nephrocalcinosis versus normal US groups were compared. RESULTS: Forty patients (28 boys, median age 2.7 years) were followed for 2 years. Fifteen (38%) had either increased echogenicity or nephrocalcinosis (group 1) at initial US. US were normal in the remaining 25 (62%) on initial assessment (group 2). eGFR did not differ between group 1 and group 2 at baseline (118 vs 133, P = 0.51) and year 2 (130 vs 131, P = 1.00). The percentage of patients with abnormal markers of tubular function was similar in both groups at year 2 (high urine calcium: creatinine 33 versus 30, P = 0.83; high urine calcium: citrate 39 versus 42, P = 0.87; low urine citrate: creatinine 15 versus 17, P = 1.00; high urine oxalate: creatinine 39 versus 25, P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of PIF patients with a history of parenteral nutrition (PN) exposure have nephrocalcinosis and/or increased echogenicity on US. Over a 2-year follow-up period, however, these abnormalities had no impact on eGFR or renal tubular function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".