MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046868817 · doi:10.1071/fp19327

Identification and functional characterisation of late blight resistance polymorphic genes in Russet Burbank potato cultivar

2020· article· en· W3046868817 on OpenAlexaff
Niranjan Hegde, Dadakhalandar Doddamani, Ajjamada C. Kushalappa

Bibliographic record

VenueFunctional Plant Biology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversitySte. Anne's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndelBiologyPhytophthora infestansGeneGeneticsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismBlightPlant disease resistancePhenylpropanoidGenomeGenotypeBotanyBiosynthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In plants, the biosynthesis of the phenylpropanoid, flavonoid and fatty acid pathway monomers, polymers and conjugated metabolites play a vital role in disease resistance. These are generally deposited to reinforce cell walls to contain the pathogen to the site of infection. Identification of sequence variants in genes that biosynthesise these resistance metabolites can explain the mechanisms of disease resistance. The resistant and susceptible genotypes inoculated with Phytophthora infestans were RNA sequenced to identify the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertion/deletion (InDel) variations. The SNPs/InDels were annotated and classified into different categories based on their effect on gene functions. In the selected 25 biosynthetic genes overlapping 39 transcripts, a total of 52 SNPs/InDels were identified in the protein-coding (CDS) regions. These were categorised as deleterious based on prediction of their effects on protein structure and function. The SNPs/InDels data obtained in this study can be used in genome editing to enhance late blight resistance in Russet Burbank and other potato cultivars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFunctional Plant BiologySame topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207