MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046979511 · doi:10.3390/math8081282

Coordination in Coupled Arrays of Stiff Filaments—Modelling and Simulation

2020· article· en· W3046979511 on OpenAlexaff
Davide Spinello

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMicro and Nano Robotics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerrestrial locomotionCollective behaviorComputer scienceCiliumFlagellumBiological systemPhysicsBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the mechanical model of an array of elastic filaments and simulate the response with different mechanical couplings. This class of systems is inspired by robust and elegant solutions for locomotion mechanics that have emerged in several small-scale biological entities in the form of beating protrusions, such as cellular cilia and eukaryotic flagella. The collective dynamics of cilia arrays reveals important features such as array alignments, two-phase asymmetric beating of individual filaments, and the emergence of metachronal coordination, which make them suitable for bio-inspired terrestrial and aquatic locomotion. The model presented here is the basis for further developments towards the design of terrestrial and aquatic locomotion systems for general purpose robotic devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematicsSame topicMicro and Nano RoboticsFrench-language works237,207